The installation ceremony for the 3rd-degree chief of Ntunze, in the Bazou subdivision, West region of Cameroon, was marked by a protocol incident that sparked outrage. The sub-prefect of Bazou publicly questioned His Majesty Happy Tchoua Marcellin, the superior chief of Bazou, on matters of protocol, an act deemed disrespectful by many witnesses.
According to testimonies, the sub-prefect interrupted the solemn entrance of the superior chief, who was accompanied by a delegation of other traditional monarchs. The intervention, perceived as abrupt and authoritarian, created a palpable unease among the audience. Charles Armel Mbatchou, a TV and radio host present at the ceremony, reported that the tone used by the sub-prefect was deemed inappropriate for an event honoring traditional institutions.
Voices are now being raised to demand the departure of the sub-prefect, accused of ignorance of local realities and lack of respect towards a centuries-old institution. For the notables of Bazou, the attack on the figure of the superior chief is considered an attack on the soul of the community.
Traditional chiefs in Cameroon play an important role in society, in conflict resolution, preservation of cultural heritage and maintenance of social cohesion. They are recognized by law and act as advisors to local administrations. However, their role has evolved over time, particularly with colonization and decentralization.
The sub-prefect, as the representative of the State in the subdivision, is responsible for ensuring the application of laws, coordinating the actions of public services and maintaining order. He is appointed by presidential decree and is placed under the authority of the prefect. This incident raises the question of the balance between the authority of the State and the respect for traditional institutions, which are particularly important in the Cameroonian context.
The Bazou affair highlights the sensitivity of issues related to protocol and respect for traditional figures in Cameroon. The incident has revived debates on the place and role of traditional chieftaincies in the administration of the country.
