Kaptmedia

Aïcha Kamoise Case: Steve Fah Reveals the Bienou Camp's Version

Influencer Steve Fah shares Steven Bienou's version of the Aïcha Kamoise case: cessation of publications, withdrawal of videos, and no reference to his family, conditions for withdrawing complaints in

Aïcha Kamoise Case: Steve Fah Reveals the Bienou Camp's Version
Cameroon News

The case involving blogger Aïcha Kamoise continues to generate strong reactions. Influencer Steve Fah spoke out this weekend to share his perspective after exchanging views with the various stakeholders.

According to Steve Fah, an indirect meeting with Steven Bienou, through an intermediary, allowed him to better understand the plaintiff's position. Bienou highlights the impact of Aïcha Kamoise's publications on his family life, particularly on his wife.

Steven Bienou's demands, according to Steve Fah, are said to be "clear and precise": a definitive end to any public statements about him, the removal of all videos concerning him, a complete absence of reference to his business or his family, and the formalization of these commitments in writing. Contrary to certain rumors circulating on social networks, no request for public apologies on video has been made.

A crucial point is that Steven Bienou is said to be ready to withdraw his complaints, filed in Cameroon and France, as soon as these conditions are met.

Steve Fah also claims to have gone to the judicial police to meet Aïcha Kamoise, who is currently in custody in connection with this case. He is said to have adopted a firm tone, denouncing certain excesses observed on social networks. The blogger is said to have admitted to sometimes exceeding certain limits and accepted the principle of withdrawing the incriminating content.

Aïcha Kamoise is also said to have expressed deep personal discomfort, mentioning a former friendship with Steven Bienou's wife, whom she says she supported in the past, and a break-up that is now difficult to live with in this legal context.

Steve Fah calls for greater responsibility in the use of social networks, recalling that freedom of expression cannot justify personal attacks. He clarifies that the complaint was brought exclusively by the husband, and not by his wife. The case continues with proceedings underway in Cameroon and France, and could see further developments.

Source : www.lebledparle.com